Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index31.331.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding10841112
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10711092

Math Too close to call

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math11071143

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert10391087

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10521037
LMArena Chinese10611063
LMArena Russian10461060
LMArena French1065—
LMArena German1054—
LMArena Japanese971—
LMArena Korean988—
LMArena Spanish1049—

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10571088

Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10561122

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text10941096
LMArena Creative Writing10601071
LMArena Multi-Turn10401063

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper