Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 4 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 31.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1025 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1047 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1072 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1060 |
Long Context Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 998 |
Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.