Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

30.7

Rank #275 Confirmed

Gemma 3 4B Google

27.9

Rank #320 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 27.8 to 11.8.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Gemma 3 4B specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index30.727.9
Released—2025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Coding10841230
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—19.6%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Hard Prompts10711253
Kagi LLM Benchmark—25.2%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—2.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.02

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Math11071239
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.5%

Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Expert10391223
GPQA Diamond—23.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.4%

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Non-English10521273
LMArena German10541281
LMArena Russian10461294
LMArena Chinese1060—
LMArena French1064—
LMArena Japanese971—
LMArena Korean988—
LMArena Spanish1049—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Instruction Following10571239

Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Longer Query10561274

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITGemma 3 4B
LMArena Text10941291
LMArena Creative Writing10591270
LMArena Multi-Turn10401255
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1068

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Gemma 3 4B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper