Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Gemma 2B
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 30.6 to 24.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | 45% | 34.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 989 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.57 |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1009 |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 937 |
| LMArena French | 1064 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 971 |
Long Context Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 981 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | 986 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 945 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Gemma 2B?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Gemma 2B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.