Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 30.4 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1028 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1089 |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 984 |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1059 |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1023 |
Long Context Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.