Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.