Model comparison
DBRX vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 32.9.
Side by side
| DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.