Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 25.1.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.338.1
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding10341412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10051372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math10471365

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert9701338

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English9881346
LMArena Chinese10121357
LMArena German9441325
LMArena Korean8991305
LMArena Russian9901366
LMArena French—1398
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following9921355

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10031378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text10221357
LMArena Creative Writing9981333
LMArena Multi-Turn9591365

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper