Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1361 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1394 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and o1 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.