Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Mistral Small 3.1
Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 41.4 to 24.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 102K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.56 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1309 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1278 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1261 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1258 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1254 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1266 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1263 |
| LMArena French | — | 1270 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |
Long Context Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1300 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1278 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1253 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1270 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Mistral Small 3.1?
Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?
Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Mistral Small 3.1 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.