Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 46.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1457 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1442 |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1445 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1475 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1456 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1420 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1452 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.