Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 57.2 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index29.341.4
Released—2025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Coding10341411
LMArena WebDev—1242
ALE-Bench—394.93
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts10051407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Math10471408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Expert9701399
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English9881391
LMArena Chinese10121441
LMArena German9441404
LMArena Korean8991361
LMArena Russian9901387
LMArena French—1415
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Spanish—1413

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following9921376

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query10031390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text10221408
LMArena Creative Writing9981394
LMArena Multi-Turn9591389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper