Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.1 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 41.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1449 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1340 |
| SciCode | — | 38.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 340.82 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
Reasoning GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
Math GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |
Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1499 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1447 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1419 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1436 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1410 |
Long Context GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GLM-4.6?
GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GLM-4.6 better for coding?
GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GLM-4.6 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.