Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-5.4 mini

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

28.8

Rank #313 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

44.8

Rank #69 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 mini in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 64.2 to 25.3.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index28.844.8
Released—2026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$4.50
Results tracked1646

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Coding10341438
FrontierCode—27%
LMArena WebDev—1397
SciCode—49.9%
WeirdML—60.3%
ALE-Bench—1,189
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
DeepResearch Bench—36.3%

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10051424
ARC-AGI-2—18.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—61.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Thematic Generalization—61.7%
Mystery Game Puzzles—11%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—40.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.83
ForecastBench—57

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Math10471418
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—9.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—21%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—28.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Expert9701434
GPQA Diamond—86.9%
SimpleQA Verified—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Non-English9881405
LMArena Chinese10111446
LMArena German9441407
LMArena Korean8991369
LMArena Russian9901417
LMArena French—1440
LMArena Japanese—1375
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Instruction Following9921405

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Longer Query10031407

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)

BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-5.4 mini
LMArena Text10221411
LMArena Creative Writing9981370
LMArena Multi-Turn9581429
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1665

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-5.4 mini share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper