Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3 8B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 24.6 to 16.6.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3 8B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.