Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3.5-9B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 33.3.
- Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 33.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena German | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3.5-9B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3.5-9B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.6 vs 35.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3.5-9B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.