Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 3.1-70B

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 13.5.
  • Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.729.6
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Coding12551260
WeirdML—9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12481241
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.92

Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Math12721252
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Expert12151209
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
MMLU—80.1%

Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English12741219
LMArena Chinese12741215
LMArena French13071261
LMArena German12751222
LMArena Japanese12421132
LMArena Korean12321140
LMArena Russian12831234
LMArena Spanish12421253

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12531231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query12531241

Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text12791261
LMArena Creative Writing12841232
LMArena Multi-Turn12691256
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 3.1-70B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper