Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 2-13B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 48.5 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.6 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1062 |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1044 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1087 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1045 |
Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 2-13B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 2-13B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.