Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 3.1-405B

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 18.4.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.730.7
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1742

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Coding12551291
WeirdML—21.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts12481269
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.75
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Math12721281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Expert12151243
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English12741248
LMArena Chinese12741242
LMArena French13071279
LMArena German12751252
LMArena Japanese12421208
LMArena Korean12321184
LMArena Russian12831265
LMArena Spanish12421260

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following12531259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query12531266

Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text12791284
LMArena Creative Writing12841262
LMArena Multi-Turn12691297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 3.1-405B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper