Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 2-70B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 32.9 to 7.5.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 24.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202), Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1079 |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163), Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.59 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181), Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1039 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187), Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 994 |
| LMArena French | 1306 | 1089 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1142 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206), Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1071 |
Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202), Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1062 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195), Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 2-70B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 2-70B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 2-70B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.