Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Gemma 2 27B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 10.7.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 8K |
| Max output | — | 2K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1198 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.08 |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1212 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1172 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1247 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1228 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1231 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Gemma 2 27B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Gemma 2 27B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.