Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 30.2.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index56.531.4
Released2026-09-30—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding15501035
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts15481018
CritPt27.1%—

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math15361017
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English15231034
LMArena Chinese16101023
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following15381048

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query15491054

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text15341077
LMArena Creative Writing15311091
LMArena Multi-Turn15571047

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper