Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen-14B
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 71.4 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1071 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1027 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1068 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1031 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen-14B?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.