Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Trinity Large Thinking

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 37.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 0.9% for Trinity Large Thinking.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
ProviderGoogleArcee AI
Noometry Index56.538.6
Released2026-09-302026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked2124

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena WebDev16781238
SciCode61.8%36.1%
LMArena Coding15501381
FrontierSWE55%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
CritPt27.1%0.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts15481350
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math15361366
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert15531360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English15231325
LMArena Chinese16101373
LMArena Russian15371337
LMArena Spanish14971357
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following15381334

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query15491355

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonTrinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text15341340
LMArena Creative Writing15311320
LMArena Multi-Turn15571342

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Trinity Large Thinking share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper