Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #20 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 38.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 55% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 24% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.745.0
Released2026-02-192026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$12$1.60
Results tracked7132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
SciCode58.9%45.5%
LMArena Coding14831473
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena WebDev1446—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%74.8%
CritPt17.7%9.1%
Chess Puzzles55%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14841460
Mystery Game Puzzles34%17%
DTBench97.1%84%
LMCA53.8%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.92147.39
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%93.3%
LMArena Math14851467
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%—
ProofBench26%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond94.4%87.9%
LMArena Expert14841467
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12961281
LMArena Document14441444
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14751445
LMArena Chinese15281510
LMArena French14881471
LMArena German14911471
LMArena Japanese14941411
LMArena Korean14581416
LMArena Russian14961457
LMArena Spanish14801453

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14651439

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14821454
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14801454
LMArena Creative Writing14821439
LMArena Multi-Turn14861459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench 41142—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper