Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen Max
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1269 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1290 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1262 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen Max?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen Max better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen Max share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.