Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 37.9.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1550 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1548 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1536 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1553 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1538 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1549 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1557 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemini 4 Argon share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.