Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 10 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 54.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 70% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1629 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1534 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | 59.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1512 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1494 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1543 |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1480 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1493 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 50.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 55.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.