Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 10 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 61.8% for Gemini 4 Argon and 17% for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index56.527.7
Released2026-09-302025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked2143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
SciCode61.8%17%
LMArena Coding15501286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
APEX-Agents82.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
CritPt27.1%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts15481266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Math15361287
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
ProofBench99%—
Omni-MATH—37.3%
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert15531235
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English15231252
LMArena Chinese16101255
LMArena Russian15371263
LMArena Spanish14971278
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following15381248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query15491265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text15341279
LMArena Creative Writing15311249
LMArena Multi-Turn15571280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 4 Scout share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper