Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.2 90B

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 11.1.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index56.527.5
Released2026-09-302024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
SciCode61.8%—
LMArena Coding1550—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
APEX-Agents82.2%—
BALROG—27.3%
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
CritPt27.1%—
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.5

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.6%
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond—41%
LMArena Expert1553—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision—1000
GeoBench—52%
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper