Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 39.4.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1457 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1442 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1445 |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | — | 1466 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1420 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1452 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.