Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-5
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-5 in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 46.4.
- GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 46.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-02-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), GLM-5: 49.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1434 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 69.7% |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 48.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), GLM-5: 31.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | 4,432 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 52.4% |
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 73.7% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 86.8% |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), GLM-5: 27.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1452 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 44.7% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.83 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), GLM-5: 46.4 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1440 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 65.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 16.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GLM-5 leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), GLM-5: 52.3 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), GLM-5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), GLM-5: 53.7 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1454 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1423 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), GLM-5: 75.2 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1428 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), GLM-5: 44.7 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1446 |
| CL-bench | — | 18.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), GLM-5: 66.0 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1446 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1601 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-5?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 46.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-5 better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 49.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-5 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.