Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 48.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) in 2 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 48.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 14% for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning).
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 48.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-02-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1375 |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1459 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,150 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | 4,663 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 57.3% |
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 18% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1189 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1451 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 65.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 89.5% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.8% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 38.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.98 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 14% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 44.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 92.2% |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 30.2% |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | 0% |
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1481 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1458 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1443 |
| LMArena French | — | 1476 |
| LMArena German | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1420 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1437 |
| CL-bench | — | 22.2% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 11.9% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1451 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1438 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1574 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 48.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46.