Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 49.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 4 Argon in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 62.0 to 49.2.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1550 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1548 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Too close to call
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1536 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1553 |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1538 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 49.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 49.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.