Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs GLM-4.7-Flash
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 36.1.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1383 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1356 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1355 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1357 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 60.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1350 |
| LMArena French | — | 1332 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1327 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1345 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.