Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 21.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 83.1% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 39.7% for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index52.337.3
Released2025-12-172026-05-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output66K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$3$1.11
Results tracked595

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
ALE-Bench1,367694.12
SWE-bench Verified75.4%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1439—
SWE-bench Multilingual72.7%—
SciCode—40%
GSO9.8%—
WeirdML61.6%—
LMArena Coding1460—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench64.3%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking27.3%—
τ²-bench Retail76.8%—
τ²-bench Telecom91.2%—
DeepResearch Bench49.8%—
BALROG48.1%—
GDP.pdf10%—
LMArena Search1198—
Vending-Bench 23,635—

Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)83.1%39.7%
ARC-AGI-233.6%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
ARC-AGI-184.7%—
CritPt—2.3%
Chess Puzzles40%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1465—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench89.1%—
LMCA43.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.8—
ForecastBench58.5—

Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.6%68.5%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench15%—
LMArena Math1473—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)35.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond89.4%—
SimpleQA Verified66.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate13.5%—
LMArena Expert1462—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1285—
GeoBench88%—
VPCT72.6%—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1413—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1458—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1477—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Japanese1489—
LMArena Korean1443—
LMArena Russian1480—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1437—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1452—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash PreviewStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1466—
LMArena Creative Writing1457—
LMArena Multi-Turn1471—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Step 3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper