Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GPT-4.1 mini
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 mini costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 32 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 10.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 84.7% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 3.5% for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | 23.9% |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | 3.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | 7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1349 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | 7% |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 68.8% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | 135.01 |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 44.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1343 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | 4.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | 12.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1338 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | 1181 |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | 1358 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1319 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1333 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1300 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1354 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than GPT-4.1 mini?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 mini costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-4.1 mini?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GPT-4.1 mini share?
32 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.