Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 28.5.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index59.842.5
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14971390
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14941399
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15071414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert15081395
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14841395
LMArena Chinese15481425
LMArena Korean14831406
LMArena Russian15161385
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14831374

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14921384

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14861401
LMArena Creative Writing14901392
LMArena Multi-Turn14891393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper