Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 25.9.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.838.8
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14971314
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14941299
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math15071298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert15081289
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14841265
LMArena Chinese15481314
LMArena German14981231
LMArena Japanese15121207
LMArena Russian15161271
LMArena French1505—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14831275

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14921292

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14861299
LMArena Creative Writing14901262
LMArena Multi-Turn14891299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper