Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.4

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 20.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 47% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 0% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.7-Flash specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index59.838.4
Released2026-08-132026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M200K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$0.40
Results tracked4421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14991383
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
Chess Puzzles47%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14971356
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%58.3%
LMArena Math15111354
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
GPQA Diamond94.8%60.5%
LMArena Expert15081357
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14851331
LMArena Chinese15531403
LMArena French15121332
LMArena German14851336
LMArena Korean14861284
LMArena Russian15191333
LMArena Spanish15071351
LMArena Japanese1506—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14861327

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14931345

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14871351
LMArena Creative Writing14901297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing17231125
LMArena Multi-Turn14951342

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper