Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 21.7.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.833.6
Released2026-08-132024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14991184
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts14971168
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math15111185
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert15081144
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14851142
LMArena Chinese15531206
LMArena French15121150
LMArena German14851123
LMArena Japanese15061074
LMArena Korean14861044
LMArena Russian15191118
LMArena Spanish15071141

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14861158

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query14931157

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14871175
LMArena Creative Writing14901148
LMArena Multi-Turn14951160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper