Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen1.5-110B
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 31.1.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.