Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen-14B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 19.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.831.4
Released2026-08-132023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14971071
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14941027
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27113.03
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Math15071068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14841041
LMArena Chinese15481077
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14831031

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14921028

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Text14861051
LMArena Creative Writing14901028
LMArena Multi-Turn14891022
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen-14B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper