Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen-14B

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 31.2.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen-14B specifications
GPT-6 SolQwen-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.831.4
Released2026-09-222023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14471071
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14181027
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72113.03
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Math14021068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1439—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English13851041
LMArena Chinese14051077
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Russian1401—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14121031

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14111028

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen-14B
LMArena Text13951051
LMArena Creative Writing13781028
LMArena Multi-Turn14121022
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper