Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 25.9.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index59.838.7
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14971319
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14941302
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math15071316
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert15081273
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14841255
LMArena Chinese15481300
LMArena French15051291
LMArena German14981290
LMArena Russian15161254
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14831275

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14921296

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14861300
LMArena Creative Writing14901256
LMArena Multi-Turn14891290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper