Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4o

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

GPT-4o OpenAI

28.6

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-4o in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 9.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 95.5% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 4.5% for GPT-4o.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for GPT-4o.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4o specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index59.828.6
Released2026-08-132024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$10
Results tracked4472

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), GPT-4o: 24.8 (#328)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Coding14971297
SWE-bench Verified—31%
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—21.6%
Aider Polyglot—45.3%
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
GSO—0%
WeirdML—25.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct—51.1%
LiveBench Coding—51.4%
BigCodeBench Complete—61.1%
CadEval—26%
ALE-Bench904.3—
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—72.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), GPT-4o: 21.0 (#141)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
APEX-Agents67.8%—
GDPval—9.9%
Remote Labor Index5%—
TheAgentCompany—8.6%
Cybench—12.5%
BALROG—32.3%
GDP.pdf23.8%—
LMArena Search—1006
METR Time Horizons—40.8%

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), GPT-4o: 9.4 (#343)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
ARC-AGI-284.6%0%
ARC-AGI-195.5%4.5%
CritPt14.3%0%
Chess Puzzles47%13%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941281
DTBench96.8%64.5%
LMCA50.4%16.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27128.97
SimpleBench—17.8%
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning—55.8%
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—60.9%
ForecastBench—57.7
LiveBench—55.3%

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), GPT-4o: 10.6 (#312)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%0.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%6.4%
LMArena Math15071285
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
Omni-MATH—29.3%
LiveBench Math—49.5%
MATH Level 5—53.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), GPT-4o: 28.8 (#242)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
GPQA Diamond94.8%49.2%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%26%
LMArena Expert15081250
Humanity's Last Exam—2.7%
MMLU-Pro—71.3%
Confabulations—15.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52%
MMLU—88.1%

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), GPT-4o: 34.5 (#91)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Vision13161137
Video-MME—71.9%
GeoBench—71%
VPCT—40%
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
ScienceQA—88.5%

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), GPT-4o: 43.2 (#186)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Non-English14841283
LMArena Chinese15481277
LMArena French15051304
LMArena German14981282
LMArena Japanese15121257
LMArena Korean14831234
LMArena Russian15161286
LMArena Spanish15031292

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), GPT-4o: 66.6 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Instruction Following14831278
LiveBench Instruction Following—68.6%
IFEval—81.7%

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), GPT-4o: 39.4 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Longer Query14921289
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), GPT-4o: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o
LMArena Text14861300
LMArena Creative Writing14901292
LMArena Multi-Turn14891302
Short-Story Creative Writing—81.8%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
WildBench—82.8%
LiveBench Language—47.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GPT-4o?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-4o?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GPT-4o lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-4o better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 24.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4o share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o has 72.

Related comparisons

Go deeper