Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.3

Rank #319 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 17.7.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.828.3
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1499999
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1497976
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math15111026
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1508980
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1485979
LMArena Chinese15531024
LMArena German1485902
LMArena Russian1519952
LMArena French1512—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1486—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1486979

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1493988

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1487997
LMArena Creative Writing1490969
LMArena Multi-Turn1495977
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper