Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #30 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 58.9 to 27.3.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index54.141.8
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 49.6 (#45), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14921389
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1536—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.4 (#56), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents46.9%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.9 (#20), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14861399
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.36—

Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.0 (#33), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15041414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#7), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14891395
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.7 (#55), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1297—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.8 (#17), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14701395
LMArena Chinese15301424
LMArena Korean14351403
LMArena Russian14901384
LMArena French1501—
LMArena German1478—
LMArena Japanese1477—
LMArena Spanish1477—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.2 (#27), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14671375

Long Context Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#47), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14751384

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.3 (#26), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14781401
LMArena Creative Writing14641391
LMArena Multi-Turn14811393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.6 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper