Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1389 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1502 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1493 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1525 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | 1453 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1491 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1478 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1375 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1481 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1467 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.