Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Yi-34B

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 92.8% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index54.227.8
Released2026-05-192023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Coding14921112
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14881104
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46117.39
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Math15041114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
GPQA Diamond92.8%14.7%
LMArena Expert14951061
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14761079
LMArena Chinese15261176
LMArena French14901081
LMArena German14921042
LMArena Japanese1486993
LMArena Korean1451959
LMArena Russian14931050
LMArena Spanish14801070

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14671091

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14821094

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashYi-34B
LMArena Text14821129
LMArena Creative Writing14701108
LMArena Multi-Turn14811113
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Yi-34B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Yi-34B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Yi-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper